Home

  • Free to Do Otherwise [Commentary on Browne: Article X] — The North American Anglican

    Long-time followers of this site know that this is a very serious issue with me. As I explained in my post/video Liturgy, Pentecost, Wesley and the Book of Common Prayer, Part I: What is a Liturgy?, I do not believe that Anglicanism–and by extension those churches founded on Wesleyan theology, such as Holiness and Pentecostal churches–can be considered truly Reformed. By that I mean that both election and perseverance must be absolute. If nothing else the existence of penitential rites (a common feature of Morning Prayer, Evening Prayer and the Holy Communion) mitigates against absolute perseverance. I look at this issue from a slightly different perspective in my post What I Learned About Approaching God From the 1928 Book of Common Prayer.

  • The Question of Lay Analysis by Sigmund Freud (1926) — Books & Boots

    This is probably as good of a summary of Freudianism as I have found. What we would probably call today “Cultural Freudianism” was the most powerful force driving American thought (such as it was) in the 1960’s and early 1970’s. I also think it has ruined our culture by turning life into a hypersexualised mind game. The rule of our society by an elite whose main goal in life (beyond self-perpetuation in power) is to get “laid, high or drunk” is buttressed by Freudian concepts, and our shift to a therapeutic society certainly has its roots in Freudian psychoanalysis.

    It’s interesting to note that the article states the following:

    The odd thing is that those feelings go into abeyance at about age 5 and are suppressed. Much is forgotten or loses its attraction during this period, the latency period. During the latency period the child builds up what we call reaction-formations, of disgust and shame, which combine with what it is told by parents to form a ‘morality’, something missing from the first five years as any parent knows and hard enough to instil into the older child.

    This is the period when rules of behaviour, when ethics and morality, when right and wrong are instilled into the child who is repeatedly told that the simple gratification of its wishes (as in the early years) is ‘dirty’, ‘naughty’, ‘bad’ etc. From an evolutionary point of view you can see why the tribes who managed to do this to their young probably functioned better and survived.

    We believe what happens is that the child needs a respite between the purely instinctual development of the early years, and the eruption of strength and renewed desires and lusts at puberty.

    Civilization, therefore, is based on the effective repression of individual desires. A good citizen represses their desires effectively; a bad citizen either gratifies themself in an anti-social way, or falls prey to the kind of illness we began by looking at.

    The sexualisation of life at all phases–including this one–has been the goal of cultural Freudians and their paedophilic allies for a long time, and we see that coming back with a vengeance these days in the trans movement. But civilisation indeed depends on the suppression of these desires; no suppression, no civilisation, which is where we are headed without a jolting course change.

  • This Ends Here — Northern Plains Anglican

  • Eat, Pray, Get Cancelled — Unherd

    This week has brought mixed news for beleaguered Ukrainians. Their army’s counteroffensive is taking a heavy toll on its own troops; there have been …

    Eat, Pray, Get Cancelled

  • Giving Rick Warren the Final Boot

    And they did:

    Nobody expected Rick Warren’s appeal to be successful—not even Rick Warren. But he still stood up in front of 13,000 Southern Baptists gathered in New Orleans to make his case.

    “No one is asking any Southern Baptist to change their theology! I’m not asking you to agree with my church,” he insisted, reading from a printout at a microphone on the floor of the convention hall during a three-minute speech. “I am asking you to act like a Southern Baptist, who have historically agreed to disagree on dozens of doctrines, in order to act on a common mission.”

    For messengers at the SBC annual meeting, employing women pastors was not an agree-to-disagree issue. A vast majority—88 percent—voted to uphold the decision made back in February to disfellowship Saddleback.

    Southern Baptists Reject Rick Warren’s Saddleback Appeal

    The blunt truth of the matter is that large churches like Saddleback really don’t need a denomination to thrive. These days denominations generally exist to support their medium and small size churches. The fact that the SBC has several large churches in its stable is a testament to a century and a half of evangelisation and organisation. Whether it’s going to be able to use either or both to break out of its ethnocentric and respectability trap and reach out again in a meaningful way is a whole different issue.

    It’s worth noting that many of the churches which have defected to the Global Methodist Church are the UMC’s larger churches. Although denominations primary serve their medium and small size churches, they need their larger churches for financial reasons. Given their structure and strength, the SBC, IMHO, is in a better position to survive the loss of one large church like Saddleback than the Methodists several.

    Rick Warren and his church should have taken their defenestration like Markov and moved on. But he instead chose to waste his time–and ours–on making himself and his church the issue.

  • Light On, Light Off — Northern Plains Anglican

  • Looking Back on Pat Robertson

    As he has passed earlier today, I’ll once again revert to my custom of featuring posts I wrote while he was living.

    Let’s start with Pat Robertson vs. the “Shepherding Movement”, where he took down this movement. Unfortunately, thanks to people such as Bill Gothard, the Shepherding Movement rolled on in other forms, as is evident from the problems the Duggars have experienced.

    There was clear cut authority in the New Testament, yet it was never really used. In today’s church what is the authority? The Pope? The World Council? The National Council? The Assemblies of God? The Church of God? The Methodist or Episcopal Council of Bishops? The Archbishop of Canterbury? The Full Gospel Business Men’s Board of Directors? Oral Roberts? Billy Graham? CBN? Rex Humbard? Five teachers in Fort Lauderdale? Juan Ortiz? The Southern Baptists? Ten pastors in Louisville, Kentucky.

    None of these? Every pastor? The Holy Spirit dealing with a priesthood of believers?

    If the Jerusalem Council which included eleven men who lived personally with Jesus, was very cautious and reserved in dealing with their fellowmen, how can any little group of charismatics in our confused state be so terribly dogmatic in trying to dominate others?

    Now we should turn to Pat Robertson States the Obvious on Marijuana Penalties:

    Television evangelist Pat Robertson has made inflammatory remarks in recent years that offend gays, Muslims and others, but a recent comment he made on his Christian Broadcasting Network was more notable for whom it pleased: people who want to see marijuana legalized.

    “We’re locking up people that take a couple of puffs of marijuana, and the next thing you know they’ve got 10 years,” the controversial pastor said on “The 700 Club” on Dec. 16, in a clip unearthed by bloggers this week. “I’m not exactly for the use of drugs – don’t get me wrong – but I just believe that criminalizing marijuana, criminalizing the possession of a few ounces of pot and that kind of thing, I mean, it’s just, it’s costing us a fortune and it’s ruining young people.”

    And then from No Stems, No Seeds That You Don’t Need: Pat Robertson and Marijuana:

    The liberals are picking themselves off of the floor at the realisation that Pat Robertson has come out in favour of the legalisation of marijuana.  (He’s been working up to this for some time.)  NORML, at this writing, hasn’t even gotten around to admitting it.  Many others are in shock also.

    Turning to another topic, Pat Robertson not a Creationist? That Depends Upon How You Define the Word:

    Televangelist Pat Robertson challenged the idea that Earth is 6,000 years old this week, saying the man who many credit with conceiving the idea, former Archbishop of Ireland James Ussher, “wasn’t inspired by the Lord when he said that it all took 6,000 years.”

    The statement was in response to a question Robertson fielded Tuesday from a viewer on his Christian Broadcasting Network show “The 700 Club.” In a submitted question, the viewer wrote that one of her biggest fears was that her children and husband would not go to heaven “because they question why the Bible could not explain the existence of dinosaurs.”

    He was one of the few prominent old earthers left; it bothers me that my contemporaries have abandoned ship on this topic.

    In one of his last Q&A sessions on The 700 Club, Pat stated that he had no problem with abortion in the case of rape, incest or the life of the mother. That is heresy (doctrinal and political) to many these days.

    Harvey Cox, in Fire from Heaven, characterised Pat as a moderate compared to many of his colleagues in Christian leadership. For all of the angst that the left has exuded over him, they’re not going to like most of those who come after him any better.

    Neither, for that matter, are the rest of us.

  • The Scots-Irish Ride Again on “Holding Banks Accountable”

    Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance are uniting to introduce legislation announced Thursday to reduce the risks of large bank failures.

    The Failed Bank Executives Clawback Act would propose harsher penalties for failed bank executives, which serves as a bipartisan response to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in early March, according to Warren’s office. The proposed legislation would require the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to recover some or all of executive payments from the three years prior to their bank’s failure, covering larger banks with more than $10 billion in assets.

    Liz Warren, JD Vance join forces to punish execs of failed banks

    It is not an accident that these two are leading the charge on this. Elizabeth Warren and J.D. Vance are, IMHO, the two most vociferous Scots-Irish populists on Capitol Hill. They’re on opposite ends of the political spectrum, to be sure, but ideology has never superseded resentment-based populism in Scots-Irish culture, it just took a catastrophe to bring it back into fashion. In that respect Warren and Vance are the heirs of people like Wright Patman, Carter Glass and Huey Long.

    I’ve commented on this before. First, Elizabeth Warren:

    Warren’s ancestors harboured a great deal of resentment towards those above them and shaped a great deal of public policy as a consequence of that resentment.  That’s what it’s going to take to get the kinds of policies passed the Democratic Socialists want, not the reality-obscuring intersectionality that dominates leftist rhetoric.  Whether they’re ready to appeal to a mentality that resents Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey as much as it resents the Kochs remains to be seen.  Whether the Democrats are ready to embrace someone like Elizabeth Warren also remains to be seen. 

    Elizabeth Warren and the Resentful Scots-Irish

    And J.D. Vance:

    But he’s also right about the oligarchic nature of American elites and their idea of staying in power. (Just check out our Gini coefficient…) So how to square the two? A simple approach would be to take a class-based approach.

    JD Vance Can’t Handle the Truth. Or Can He?

    If Elizabeth Warren–and others on the left–can get past the “faculty lounge” issues that dominate their discussion, and J.D. Vance–and others on the right–can get past the Reaganite “upward mobility” issues that dominate their memory, our politics will be upended once again by those notorious interlopers of our history, the Scots-Irish.

  • Tara Reade Flees to Russia

    A woman who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault during the 2020 presidential race appeared Tuesday in Moscow and said she was asking President Vladimir Putin for Russian citizenship.

    Tara Reade, who worked in now-President Biden’s congressional office for a short period in 1993, said she wanted to stay in Russia after a Republican lawmaker told her she was in physical danger.

    Reade, 59, said in an interview streamed by the Sputnik media group — a Russian press outlet — that she’d arrived in Russia as a vacationer.

    “When I got off the plane in Moscow, for the first time in a very long time, I felt safe. And I felt heard and felt respected,” she said. “I’m still kind of in a daze a bit, but I feel very good,” she said. “I feel very surrounded by protection and safety.”

    Biden sex assault accuser Tara Reade asks for Russian citizenship

    It’s always been interesting that feminists have always believed the victim until it is politically inexpedient to do so. That was certainly the case in the Clinton years with the multiple flings that he engaged in. And it’s certainly the case with Tara Reade now, even with a President who doesn’t even come near to having what Bill Clinton had going for him.

    But post-1960’s feminism has a suicidal streak to it, as the transgender movement has shown. And, as things become more and more unhinged on these shores, we can expect more and more people (like Tina Turner) to seek the safety and tranquility of others.

  • May His Soul Be Bound Up…Northern Plains Anglican

    This tragedy–a serviceman being killed right at the end of World War II trying to come home–is on par with my uncle, who was killed while training to go overseas in the Army Air Force.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started