Response to the Comments on “Reflections on an Orthodox View of the Eucharist”

My four-part series on this subject got a few comments, which will enable me to expand on some things that obviously weren't clear in the first part. First thing to note: I got no responses from my Pentecostal bretheren on this subject, after the considerable back and forth on this subject here.  Sooner or later …

Rowan Williams and the Visions of Lourdes: One Accomplishment, One Legend, One Nightmare

I wanted to ignore this but couldn't: The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, was today branded a ‘papal puppet’ after he became the first leader of the Church of England to accept visions of the Virgin Mary at Lourdes as historical fact. He asserted that 18 visions of Our Lady allegedly experienced by  Bernadette …

Reflections on an Orthodox View of the Eucharist: Part IV

Continuing from before with John of Damascus' The Orthodox Faith, 4, 13: The bread and the wine are not merely figures of the body and blood of Christ (God forbid!) but the deified body of the Lord itself: for the Lord has said, "This is My body," not, this is a figure of My body: …

Reflections on an Orthodox View of the Eucharist: Part III

Continuing in this series, we get to the heart of the matter: The body which is born of the holy Virgin is in truth body united with divinity, not that the body which was received up into the heavens descends, but that the bread itself and the wine are changed into God's body and blood. …

Reflections on an Orthodox View of the Eucharist: Part II

I pick up from last time in John of Damascus' The Orthodox Faith, 4,13: For it was fitting that not only the first-fruits of our nature should partake in the higher good but every man who wished it, and that a second birth should take place and that the nourishment should be new and suitable …

Reflections on an Orthodox View of the Eucharist: Part I

In a recent posting on MissionalCOG on the contextualisation of Communion, the thread turned from how to contextualise it to what it meant, and specifically whether it was sacramental or simply an ordinance. Related to this question is the nature of the Eucharist. It's always bothered me that Evangelicals, who are generally solicitous about their …

The Saga of Deborah Pitt Continues

Evidently the Bishop of Durham, N.T. Wright, isn't happy with Dr. Deborah Pitt's revelation of the Archbishop of Canterbury's letters to her concerning committed homosexual relationships, as she has responded in Anglican Samizdat (also here as well.) It has given me great pain to be doing this, to even care about these things. Do you …

More on Commitment and Homosexuality

The comments to my last post on this subject have been interesting. Let me start with Margaret: I also am puzzled by this insistence that “committed” equally “right”. Ahab and Jezebel were “committed” but it was never “right” for a Jewish king to marry outside the faith. Similarly Samson and Delilah were “committed” at least …

When Ministers are Asked to Underperform

Recently I was talking with some Episcopalian friends of mine about the rather vacuous, primer-like articles that their bishop (Diocese of East Tennessee's Charles von Rosenberg) had written (and had been spread around the Anglican world by Kendall Harmon) in anticipation of and in the wake of the Lambeth 2008 conference. Needless to say, they …

The Woman Who Outed the Archbishop of Canterbury

I was honoured to receive the following comment from my piece Rowan Williams and the High Price of Riding the Fence: I have been catching up with stuff on the Web concerning the letters the Archbishop of Canterbury wrote me. My reply to Dr. Williams’ first letter ran to more than six pages, and I …

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started