Home

  • Elevations on the coming of St. John the Baptist, Forerunner of Jesus Christ: 5, Continuation of the words of the angel: The effect of Saint John’s preaching is predicted

  • Elevations on the coming of St. John the Baptist, Forerunner of Jesus Christ: 4, The Conception of Saint John the Baptist, like that of Jesus Christ, is announced by the angel Saint Gabriel

  • Elevations on the coming of St. John the Baptist, Forerunner of Jesus Christ: 3, First Preparatory Circumstance of the Life of Saint John the Baptist; its Design

  • Smyth’s Spankings Come Back to Haunt British Evangelicals

    It’s not getting better, even with the departure of the current Occupant at Canterbury:

    The long knives are out. John Smyth’s sadistic behavior which has claimed the Archbishop of Canterbury, could claim as much as 30 percent of the Church of England’s evangelicals, a confidential source told VOL.

    There has been a conspiracy of silence — Omerta — to protect those accused of abuse, VOL was told. “Up to 30% of the CofE is tainted.”

    Evangelicals have grown rapidly in number and influence these past thirty years on the assumption that they “put bums on pews.” It has similarities with the prosperity gospel preachers who, one by one, have fallen from their prominent perches.

    My reaction–and one David Virtue reproduced–a while back was this:

    Pilavachi isn’t unique in his being drawn to kinky sex practices; the Anglican Evangelicals have had their woes with John Smyth, Jonathan Fletcher and the Iwerne Camp fiasco. What is wrong with these people?

    I think that is the question that British Evangelicals should be asking themselves. I’m not sure I have a good answer for that, but one thing is obvious: the reputation that Evangelicals have to “put bums in pews” is being tarnished by putting bums somewhere else they’re not supposed to be. But perhaps a conversation starter is in order.

    In addition to the usual prurient reasons, I think some of this comes from the idea that “suffering builds character.” While it can do that (James 1:2-4,) and corporal punishment is certainly a fast way to induce suffering, it seems to me that if you, almost an adult, got that from someone who was supposed to be your spiritual mentor, what ends up getting built is pain and resentment. A regimen to build maturity needs to be built more constructively, which is one reason why people on this side of the Atlantic join the military and go to places such as Parris Island. (Fun fact: I had a student who was in the Marines and one of her last duty posts was being a DI at Parris Island. She was definitely up to it.)

    A more Christian approach for this problem–and one Anglicans on both sides of the Atlantic should seriously consider–is to spend time with people who really have suffered in life from poverty and learn from their experience. That’s been my life in the Church of God these last two score, and it’s been an education. If there’s one thing I’ve noticed, it’s that, after a lot of deprivation, people tend to err on the side of creature comfort, even in relief operations.

    One thing is for sure: Evangelicals in the UK need to take their lumps on this and get back to doing what their name implies: evangelising the island, because they’ve got a competitor who does a lot worse than spanking.

  • Lack of Post? Not Really!

    My posting on this blog is sparser than it used to be, and especially these last few months. But that doesn’t mean I’ve been inactive online; I’ve been doing a lot of posting, but not here. So perhaps it’s a good idea to bring everyone up to date.

    It’s worth reminding everyone that this blog wasn’t the first site I put out on the internet. That honour goes to vulcanhammer.net; this one came the following month in 1997. My objective with that site and its progeny has been to disseminate technical information for the geotechinical (soil mechanics and foundations) industry. Ultimately the idea was that a) that information would be useful for people in developing countries (and students here) to raise their standard of living without a paywall and b) to be a Christian outreach in the process, with this site as an auxiliary to aid in that. Eventually I just put the relevant Christian material there along with everything else.

    Six years later I started the site Chet Aero Marine, which initially documented my family history in the sky and later on the water. This site has experienced quite a lot of “mission creep” (like some of our weapon systems) and one of these expansions was as a home for the sites for my Fluid Mechanics Laboratory course at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. But now it is the platform for my latest adventure: teaching engineering at Lee University, and specifically Statics.

    I’ve discussed the need for an institution like Lee to have an engineering program. But at a time in life when most academics are looking to “hang it up” I plunged into a course which, although I took it a long time ago and used it in my family business, have never taught it. So there’s a lot of course prep, and if you look at the course site I’ve developed you’ll see what I’m talking about.

    I feel very strongly that engineering in particular is a good thing for Christian colleges to do. In an day when the liberal arts are as politicised as they are, we need a balance, and an engineering program is one way to accomplish that. Engineering programs also produce graduates which can have an income to pay back their student loans and give the practitioners a decent living, and that’s more than many majors can say. And, of course, by putting at least some of my course material online, others can benefit, as they have done with my other courses for many years.

    In the process of all of this engineering education has its peculiarities. I’ve been at this since 2001, and was in practice before that. I’ve been an advisor both to curriculum development and further accreditation of the program. As one of my colleagues at UTC noted, it’s not very often you get to do that in the early stages of a program, and for the opportunity I am grateful.

    Finally I, like the great Saint-Venant, believe that engineering is a kind of ministry whose benefits will make people’s lives better. Too much Christian benevolence is focused on relief, and while relief is important (as those just to the east of me in North Carolina will tell you) prevention of the effects of disaster can have a greater impact at lower cost. Traditionally that job has been the state’s, but that isn’t always the case, and with governments becoming more erratic in their regard for their people we can expect other people and organisations stepping up to the plate with civil and other projects.

    Lee also requires a devotion at the start of class; I’ve drawn from the many stories that I communicated to my students at UTC online and also from my last devotional book Month of Sundays.

    So perhaps stop by and check this out; I’m also teaching Dynamics at Lee this Spring. As they say in late night, there’s more to come.

  • Ministerial Character, Intention, and the Sacraments–North American Anglican

    This has been a lot hotter issue in the past than it is now, but it’s an important one. Bossuet discussed it in his History of the Variations of the Protestant Churches; my comment on the subject is as follows:

    Especially interesting are the Vaudois, who were in reality an unauthorised, non-celibate religious community in Catholicism more than a stand-alone church; their main fault is that they believed that unworthy priests did not administer valid sacraments.  (Anyone who has been in church work knows that gauging the worthiness of ministers can be a dicey proposition at best; I think the Vaudois were unreasonable in that regard.)

    This is not to say that we should not be vigilant in weeding out ministers of bad character; it means that they are able to administer sacraments and do other good things, shall we say, in spite of themselves. On that point, getting rid of the sacraments doesn’t really solve the problem, especially when we consider those who have evangelised in the past and then fallen. They have a lot to answer for, but at least someone involved is going to heaven…

  • Just a Reminder of What Happens to People Who Resign in the UK

    As a follow-up to my post Justin Welby Throws the Towel In, a reminder of what happens to people who resign in the UK is in order:

    Be seeing you!

  • Justin Welby Throws the Towel In

    Justin Welby Throws the Towel In

    You can read his resignation letter above.

    In my own church we have a successful minister who, at a previous church to the one he’s in now, had a campaign for his church entitled “Trading Your Title for a Towel.” When he resigned his church for another appointment, I noted that the only thing he could do was throw the towel in.

    That’s what Justin Welby has done. When he was appointed, quite a few in the ACNA felt a thrill up their leg at the idea of an “evangelical” becoming Archbishop of Canterbury, as they hoped it would ultimately result in the ACNA being in communion with Canterbury, a long-time goal for many.

    Well, as was the case in 1783, we’re on our own, and I think that reality has sunk in around the ACNA and elsewhere.

    I’ve never been enthusiastic about Justin Welby. I could not believe that the same government that passed the Equalities Act would appoint an orthodox Archbishop, and subsequent events have not disappointed. He has compounded that with a corporatist management style (not appropriate for a church.) His undoing was his misplaced confidence in the police; the UK’s law enforcement apparatus’ inverse priorities are all too evident these days.

    I doubt that the government that appointed him–especially with Labour at the helm–will do anything but worse in the orthodoxy department, and the decline of the Church of England will continue.

  • American Industry Must Rise Again–Unherd

    Austerity is rarely popular during election season, and already this campaign has featured a variety of budget-straining proposals. Donald Trump has called for exempting tips from taxation, which Kamala Harris subsequently endorsed. J.D. Vance has suggested increasing the child tax credit to $5,000; Harris later upped her bid to $6,000. The current vice president has also proposed $25,000 in down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers, while Trump has promised to make Social Security benefits and overtime pay tax free. The list will probably continue to grow…

    American Industry Must Rise Again
  • Jeff Bezos’ Fateful Choice

    Among the many memorable events we’ve had this election cycle–which will doubtless not end with Election Day next Tuesday–was Jeff Bezos’ decision that the Washington Post, his newspaper, would not endorse a candidate for President. Coming on the heels of a similar decision at the Los Angeles Times by another newly wealthy entrepreneur, it was a shock to the Post’s largely leftist readership base, to say nothing of the staff.

    I read Bezos’ rationale for his decision and, while what he said is true, I can’t believe that’s all there is to it. Life and politics in this country is the biggest kabuki theatre (with apologies to the Japanese) in the world, where in a supposedly open society no one ever lets out their real motivations or objectives. That’s why, for example, we have the spectacle of a billionaire leading the lower middle classes in a revolt against the system, because the latter are too ashamed to admit that, in a country where anyone can supposedly go anywhere in life they want to, they’re on the losing end of the economic system.

    On the other end, I think that Bezos is the victim of another hiding of the real objective: the legacy of the hippie radicals. He’s not alone: I think one problem I had with my Canadian sheeple was that he laughed at them in the 1960’s, not taking them seriously then or now, while I’ve always taken them very seriously. Bezos came into adulthood after that debacle; the left leaning elites, paragons of respectability after they got their rude shock with Ronald Reagan, wrapped themselves in the flag they once gleefully burned and presented themselves as the paragons of polite company.

    Make no mistake: Bezos is as cold and ruthless of a business person as there is. But when entrepreneurs rise to the top, they want to be acknowledged by people whom they think can confer the mantle of respectability, the people we used to call in the old Episcopal Church our “betters.” What he’s starting to discover, however, is that the people he runs with now have objectives which are, to use my father’s expression, “basically inimical” to those which made Bezos the success that he has become.

    Back in the day we were told that all of this striving for success was useless and made us suburban phonies, that we should be authentic, expressing that authenticity in not only getting laid, high or drunk, but in making those our life’s objectives (and making sure no one else had any other.) Such a sybaritic mindset is deeply Luddite but also comes against those who still think we should do great things. The way to enforce this in society can be summed up in one word: equity. If we all are supposed to end up in the same place, that can only happen if we all get paid the same and all are at the same economic level. The whole range of left wing causes–BLM, DEI, antisemitism–stem from a basic desire to throttle real achievement in our society and to, as Chairman Mao used to say, “put politics in command.”

    Kamala Harris is a poster child for this idea. She came up getting laid, high and drunk for personal advancement, and when she was her authentic self she paraded the hippy dreamers’ wish list in a way that even outdid Bernie Sanders, a real hippy dreamer. Now that she is running for President, she’d like us all to forget that, so she buries her real idea in her now famous “word salads.”

    Bezos may be cold and ruthless but he’s not stupid; I think the reality of what he’s gone along with is finally sinking in. Elon Musk, his peer, has taken things much further and gone all in for Donald Trump, at no small personal risk. It’s hard sometimes to convince immigrants that those who hold the strings of power are so deeply regressive, but when they figure that out, they respond in a way that puts the native born to shame.

    Immigrants are a reminder that the United States isn’t the only game in town. This leads us to the ultimate question: how is it possible for a country lead by an elite that is so averse to real achievement, either by themselves or anyone else in the country, to take on and defeat adversaries such as Vladimir Putin and especially Yi Xinping? The answer is simple: they can’t, and the idea that they can is the biggest lie the American left has ever foisted on our people. That simple fact is a big reason why I have never been able to bring myself to become a part of the American left, that reason only exceeded by the fact that they are, in large part, God-hating people.

    We have a choice in front of us that isn’t pleasant. Our political system has been good in serving up unpleasant political choices this past decade. But if we enthrone the American left at the pinnacle of our society, we are doomed as a nation. It’s that simple. Elon Musk has figured that out; Jeff Bezos is starting to do that. The blowback for both of these people–and others–will be severe if the hippy dreamers and their children–natural and intellectual–make the decisions. But it will be worse When the People’s Liberation Army Marches Down Pennsylvania Avenue.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started